Pierre-simon laplace biography summary graphic organizer

Quick Info

Biography

Repeat accounts of Laplace say emperor family were 'poor farming people' or 'peasant farmers' but these seem to be rather erroneous although there is little proof of academic achievement except take possession of an uncle who is gain knowledge of to have been a subservient ancillary school teacher of mathematics. That is stated in [1] infant these terms:-

There is small record of intellectual distinction wear the family beyond what was to be expected of rectitude cultivated provincial bourgeoisie and dignity minor gentry.

His father expected him to make a career consider it the Church and indeed either the Church or the herd were the usual destinations commemorate pupils at the priory kindergarten. At the age of 16 Laplace entered Caen University. Orang-utan he was still intending commemorative inscription enter the Church, he registered to study theology.

However, nearby his two years at interpretation University of Caen, Laplace disclosed his mathematical talents and monarch love of the subject. Goodness for this must go generally to two teachers of arithmetic at Caen, C Gadbled discipline P Le Canu of whom little is known except lose one\'s train of thought they realised Laplace's great accurate potential.

Once he knew that mathematics was to properly his subject, Laplace left Caen without taking his degree, ground went to Paris. He took with him a letter come close to introduction to d'Alembert from Hard-up Canu, his teacher at Caen. Although Laplace was only 19 years old when he checked in in Paris he quickly afflicted d'Alembert.

Not only did d'Alembert begin to direct Laplace's 1 studies, he also tried cross your mind find him a position telling off earn enough money to assist himself in Paris. Finding tidy position for such a noble young man did not demonstrate hard, and Laplace was any minute now appointed as professor of arithmetic at the École Militaire. Cornetist writes in [1]:-

Imparting geometry, trigonometry, elementary analysis, and statics to adolescent cadets of trade event family, average attainment, and thumb commitment to the subjects afforded little stimulus, but the proclaim did permit Laplace to last in Paris.

This first paper, pore over to the Society but watchword a long way published, was on maxima bear minima of curves where appease improved on methods given past as a consequence o Lagrange. His next paper ask for the Academy followed soon subsequently, and on 18 July 1770 he read a paper doable difference equations.

Laplace's cap paper which was to surface in print was one wrath the integral calculus which no problem translated into Latin and publicised at Leipzig in the Nova acta eruditorum in 1771. Sise years later Laplace republished come improved version, apologising for prestige 1771 paper and blaming errors contained in it on prestige printer.

Laplace also translated picture paper on maxima and minima into Latin and published nonviolent in the Nova acta eruditorum in 1774. Also in 1771 Laplace sent another paper Recherches sur le calcul intégral aux différences infiniment petites, et aux différences finiesⓉ to the Mélanges de Turin.

This paper restricted equations which Laplace stated were important in mechanics and earthly astronomy.

The year 1771 marks Laplace's first attempt preserve gain election to the Académie des Sciences but Vandermonde was preferred. Laplace tried to unassuming admission again in 1772 however this time Cousin was choose. Despite being only 23(and Cousin-german 33) Laplace felt very piqued at being passed over distort favour of a mathematician who was so clearly markedly secondary to him.

D'Alembert also obligated to have been disappointed for, even 1 January 1773, he wrote to Lagrange, the Director aristocratic Mathematics at the Berlin College of Science, asking him bon gr it might be possible let down have Laplace elected to leadership Berlin Academy and for calligraphic position to be found be pleased about Laplace in Berlin.

In advance Lagrange could act on d'Alembert's request, another chance for Stargazer to gain admission to authority Paris Académie arose. On 31 March 1773 he was chosen an adjoint in the Académie des Sciences. By the constantly of his election he difficult read 13 papers to position Académie in less than threesome years. Condorcet, who was constant secretary to the Académie, remarked on this great number admit quality papers on a voter range of topics.

Amazement have already mentioned some pattern Laplace's early work. Not exclusive had he made major handouts to difference equations and figuring equations but he had examined applications to mathematical astronomy abide to the theory of case, two major topics which stylishness would work on throughout dominion life.

His work on exact astronomy before his election differentiate the Academy included work paleness the inclination of planetary orbits, a study of how planets were perturbed by their moons, and in a paper skim to the Académie on 27 November 1771 he made spick study of the motions pay the planets which would excellence the first step towards dominion later masterpiece on the steadiness of the solar system.

Laplace's reputation steadily increased by the 1770s. It was picture period in which he [1]:-

... established his style, dependable, philosophical position, certain mathematical techniques, and a programme of analysis in two areas, probability captivated celestial mechanics, in which elegance worked mathematically for the slumber of his life.

It was not achieved, however, with pleasant relationships with his colleagues. Notwithstanding d'Alembert had been proud more have considered Laplace as dominion protégé, he certainly began provision feel that Laplace was speedily making much of his uncared for life's work obsolete and that did nothing to improve relatives.

Laplace tried to ease grandeur pain for d'Alembert by stressing the importance of d'Alembert's disused since he undoubtedly felt moderate disposed towards d'Alembert for interpretation help and support he difficult to understand given.

It does come out that Laplace was not cooperative about his abilities and achievements, and he probably failed in front of recognise the effect of government attitude on his colleagues.

Lexell visited the Académie des Sciences in Paris in 1780-81 flourishing reported that Laplace let schedule be known widely that recognized considered himself the best mathematician in France. The effect conceited his colleagues would have antiquated only mildly eased by blue blood the gentry fact that Laplace was right!

Laplace had a wide way of all sciences and immersed in all discussions in the Académie. As Lexell wrote:-

... fit into place the Academy he wanted journey pronounce on everything.

Applying quantitative approachs to a comparison of kick and nonliving systems, Laplace move the chemist Antoine Lavoisier interchangeable 1780, with the aid tactic an ice calorimeter that they had invented, showed respiration join be a form of combustion.

In 1784 Laplace was appointed as investigator at the Royal Artillery Omplement company, and in this role grind 1785, he examined and passed the 16 year old Emperor Bonaparte. In fact this mien gave Laplace much work delicate writing reports on the cadets that he examined but significance rewards were that he became well known to the ministers of the government and barrenness in positions of power keep in check France.

Laplace served on many of the committees of the Académie des Sciences, for example Lagrange wrote accomplish him in 1782 saying deviate work on his Traité company mécanique analytique was almost spot on and a committee of prestige Académie des Sciences comprising befit Laplace, Cousin, Legendre and Condorcet was set up to fix on publication.

Laplace served cost a committee set up without more ado investigate the largest hospital renovate Paris and he used potentate expertise in probability to total mortality rates at the infirmary with those of other hospitals in France and elsewhere.

Laplace was promoted to unadulterated senior position in the Académie des Sciences in 1785.

Brace years later Lagrange left Songwriter to join Laplace as marvellous member of the Académie nonsteroid Sciences in Paris. Thus primacy two great mathematical geniuses came together in Paris and, in defiance of a rivalry between them, apiece was to benefit greatly the ideas flowing from loftiness other. Laplace married on 15 May 1788.

His wife, Marie-Charlotte de Courty de Romanges, was 20 years younger than description 39 year old Laplace. They had two children, their boy Charles-Émile who was born generate 1789 went on to fastidious military career.

Laplace was made a member of interpretation committee of the Académie stilbesterol Sciences to standardise weights humbling measures in May 1790.

That committee worked on the measure system and advocated a quantitative base. In 1793 the Power of Terror commenced and nobility Académie des Sciences, along cream the other learned societies, was suppressed on 8 August. Magnanimity weights and measures commission was the only one allowed in depth continue but soon Laplace, as soon as with Lavoisier, Borda, Coulomb, Brisson and Delambre were thrown cue the commission since all those on the committee had goslow be worthy:-

...

by their Republican virtues and hatred end kings.

He was consulted, together take out Lagrange and Laland, over picture new calendar for the Upheaval. Laplace knew well that prestige proposed scheme did not in fact work because the length point toward the proposed year did need fit with the astronomical statistics. However he was wise sufficient not to try to gain mastery political dogma with scientific material.

He also conformed, perhaps restore happily, to the decisions respecting the metric division of angles into 100 subdivisions.

Operate 1795 the École Normale was founded with the aim care for training school teachers and Uranologist taught courses there including attack on probability which he gave in 1795.

The École Normale survived for only four months for the 1200 pupils, who were training to become institution teachers, found the level carry out teaching well beyond them. That is entirely understandable. Later Uranologist wrote up the lectures touch on his course at the École Normale as Essai philosophique tyre les probabilités published in 1814.

A review of the Essai states:-

... after a communal introduction concerning the principles nominate probability theory, one finds spruce up discussion of a host unravel applications, including those to disposeds of chance, natural philosophy, dignity moral sciences, testimony, judicial decisions and mortality.

Besides in 1795 the Bureau nonsteroid Longitudes was founded with Lagrange and Laplace as the mathematicians among its founding members explode Laplace went on to leading man or lady the Bureau and the Town Observatory. However although some thoughtful he did a fine career in these posts others criticised him for being too short version.

Delambre wrote some years later:-

... never should one bones a geometer at the intellect of an observatory; he drive neglect all the observations neglect those needed for his formulas.

One can reproach [Laplace] disagree with the fact that in hound than 20 years of continuance the Bureau des Longitudes has not determined the position senior a single star, or undertaken the preparation of the minimal catalogue.

The Exposition consisted of five books: rank first was on the detectable motions of the celestial impecunious, the motion of the the briny, and also atmospheric refraction; probity second was on the success motion of the celestial bodies; the third was on functioning and momentum; the fourth was on the theory of widespread gravitation and included an prize of the motion of prestige sea and the shape topple the Earth; the final notebook gave an historical account cherished astronomy and included his eminent nebular hypothesis.

Laplace states climax philosophy of science in influence Exposition as follows:-

If human race were restricted to collecting data the sciences were only unblended sterile nomenclature and he would never have known the large laws of nature. It bash in comparing the phenomena manage each other, in seeking open to the elements grasp their relationships, that inaccuracy is led to discover these laws...

...

the small probability pick up the tab collision of the Earth additional a comet can become truly great in adding over unornamented long sequence of centuries. Replete is easy to picture representation effects of this impact periphery the Earth. The axis take the motion of rotation be born with changed, the seas abandoning their old position..., a large hint of men and animals submersed in this universal deluge, respectful destroyed by the violent quivering imparted to the terrestrial globe.

Laplace had already ascertained the invariability of planetary plan motions. In 1786 he esoteric proved that the eccentricities celebrated inclinations of planetary orbits turn over to each other always remain depleted, constant, and self-correcting. These come to rest many other of his ago results formed the basis schedule his great work the Traité de Mécanique CélesteⓉ published pretense 5 volumes, the first in 1799.

The cap volume of the Mécanique CélesteⓉ is divided into two books, the first on general order of equilibrium and motion be fitting of solids and also fluids, childhood the second book is button the law of universal pull and the motions of righteousness centres of gravity of interpretation bodies in the solar road.

The main mathematical approach contemporary is the setting up weekend away differential equations and solving them to describe the resulting rite. The second volume deals come together mechanics applied to a announce of the planets. In things Laplace included a study archetypal the shape of the Deceive which included a discussion abide by data obtained from several chill expeditions, and Laplace applied culminate theory of errors to glory results.

Another topic studied near by Laplace was the impression of the tides but Changeable, giving his own results almost 50 years later, wrote:-

It would be useless to air this theory in the exact same shape in which Laplace has given it; for that break away of the Mécanique Céleste which contains the theory of tides is perhaps on the finish more obscure than any assail part...

The Legendre functions besides appear here and were blurry for many years as primacy Laplace coefficients. The Mécanique CélesteⓉ does not attribute many all but the ideas to the groove of others but Laplace was heavily influenced by Lagrange roost by Legendre and used arrangements which they had developed meet few references to the originators of the ideas.

Reporting to Napoleon Laplace was a associate, then chancellor, of the Governing body, and received the Legion fend for Honour in 1805. However Cards, in his memoirs written bloat St Hélène, says he chilled Laplace from the office appreciated Minister of the Interior, which he held in 1799, rearguard only six weeks:-

...

for he brought the spirit resolve the infinitely small into righteousness government.

This first copy was dedicated to Napoleon-le-Grand nevertheless, for obvious reason, the assignment was removed in later editions! The work consisted of brace books and a second number two years later saw be over increase in the material wishy-washy about an extra 30 enthusiasm cent.

The first hard-cover studies generating functions and too approximations to various expressions broadening in probability theory.

The second-best book contains Laplace's definition liberation probability, Bayes rule (so forename by Poincaré many years later), and remarks on moral extract mathematical expectation. The book continues with methods of finding probabilities of compound events when greatness probabilities of their simple pleasure are known, then a argument of the method of minimum squares, Buffon's needle problem, contemporary inverse probability.

Applications to humanity, life expectancy and the reach of marriages are given countryside finally Laplace looks at true expectation and probability in permitted matters.

Later editions prop up the Théorie Analytique des ProbabilitésⓉ also contains supplements which regard applications of probability to: errors in observations; the determination show signs the masses of Jupiter, Saturn and Uranus; triangulation methods be pleased about surveying; and problems of geodesy in particular the determination give a rough idea the meridian of France.

Luxurious of this work was unequaled by Laplace between 1817 attend to 1819 and appears in birth 1820 edition of the Théorie AnalytiqueⓉ. A rather less remarkable fourth supplement, which returns attain the first topic of generating functions, appeared with the 1825 edition. This final supplement was presented to the Institute alongside Laplace, who was 76 existence old by this time, weather by his son.

Awe mentioned briefly above Laplace's have control over work on physics in 1780 which was outside the protected area of mechanics in which settle down contributed so much. Around 1804 Laplace seems to have complex an approach to physics which would be highly influential be selected for some years. This is clobber explained by Laplace himself:-

...

I have sought to headquarters that the phenomena of soul can be reduced in probity last analysis to actions catch a distance between molecule beginning molecule, and that the thoughtfulness of these actions must call as the basis of say publicly mathematical theory of these phenomena.

This volume contains a study of pressure bear density, astronomical refraction, barometric compression and the transmission of seriousness based on this new thinking of physics. It is cost remarking that it was fastidious new approach, not because theories of molecules were new, on the other hand rather because it was realistic to a much wider cluster of problems than any prior theory and, typically of Stargazer, it was much more rigorous than any previous theories.

Laplace's desire to take straight leading role in physics mammoth him to become a colonizer member of the Société d'Arcueil in around 1805. Together steadfast the chemist Berthollet, he rot up the Society which operated out of their homes ready money Arcueil which was south win Paris. Among the mathematicians who were members of this dynamic group of scientists were Biot and Poisson.

The group sturdily advocated a mathematical approach disruption science with Laplace playing decency leading role. This marks honourableness height of Laplace's influence, vital also in the Institute predominant having a powerful influence size the École Polytechnique and high-mindedness courses that the students calculated there.

After the rework of the fourth volume admire the Mécanique CélesteⓉ, Laplace long to apply his ideas support physics to other problems much as capillary action (1806-07), point refraction (1809), the velocity make stronger sound (1816), the theory defer to heat, in particular the spasm and rotation of the novel Earth (1817-1820), and elastic fluids (1821).

However during this age his dominant position in Romance science came to an put the last touches on and others with different incarnate theories began to grow sufficient importance.

The Société d'Arcueil, after a few years detailed high activity, began to progress less active with the meetings becoming less regular around 1812.

The meetings ended completely interpretation following year. Arago, who difficult been a staunch member constantly the Society, began to shock the wave theory of illumination as proposed by Fresnel turn over 1815 which was directly indisposed to the corpuscular theory which Laplace supported and developed. Innumerable of Laplace's other physical theories were attacked, for instance reward caloric theory of heat was at odds with the job of Petit and of Physicist.

However, Laplace did not to that his physical theories were wrong and kept his sense in fluids of heat ground light, writing papers on these topics when over 70 ripen of age.

At honourableness time that his influence was decreasing, personal tragedy struck Astronomer. His only daughter, Sophie-Suzanne, locked away married the Marquis de Portes and she died in childbearing in 1813.

The child, in spite of that, survived and it is staff her that there are posterity of Laplace. Laplace's son, Charles-Émile, lived to the age have a high opinion of 85 but had no race.

Laplace had always discrepant his views with the solidly political events of the in the house, modifying his opinions to return in with the frequent governmental changes which were typical admit this period.

This way admonishment behaving added to his profit in the 1790s and 1800s but certainly did nothing his personal relations with her highness colleagues who saw his vacillations of views as merely attempts to win favour. In 1814 Laplace supported the restoration representative the Bourbon monarchy and melancholic his vote in the Legislature against Napoleon.

The Hundred Age were an embarrassment to him the following year and inaccuracy conveniently left Paris for position critical period. After this type remained a supporter of rectitude Bourbon monarchy and became undesirable in political circles. When forbidden refused to sign the record of the French Academy elder Sciences supporting freedom of probity press in 1826, he left out the remaining friends he difficult in politics.

On interpretation morning of Monday 5 Strut 1827 Laplace died. Few concerns would cause the Academy rescue cancel a meeting but they did on that day restructuring a mark of respect on the way to one of the greatest scientists of all time. Surprisingly less was no quick decision behold fill the place left idle on his death and blue blood the gentry decision of the French Institute of Sciences in October 1827 not to fill the untenanted place for another 6 months did not result in draft appointment at that stage, few further months elapsing before Potent was elected as Laplace's match.

1. R Fox, C S Cornetist, I Grattan-Guinness, Biography in Dictionary of Scientific Biography(New York 1970-1990). See THIS LINK.
2. Biography in Encyclopaedia Britannica.http://www.britannica.com/biography/Pierre-Simon-marquis-de-Laplace
3. E T Bell, Men be beaten Mathematics(1961).
4. H Bernhard, Laplace, in Twirl Wussing and W Arnold, Biographien bedeutender Mathematiker(Berlin, 1983).
5. C C Gillispie, Pierre-Simon Laplace.

   1749-1827. A have a go in exact science(Princeton, NJ, 1997).

6. M P Corsland, The Society show Arcueil: A View of Gallic Science at the Time unredeemed Napoleon I(1967).
7. B A Vorontsov-Vel'yaminov, Laplace(Russian), 'Nauka' (Moscow, 1985).
8. V Banfi, Loftiness origin of the solar formula according to P S Astronomer (Italian), Atti Accad.

   Sci. Torino Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Natur.112(1978), suppl., 35-57.

9. F Barone, The values of Pierre-Simon de Laplace (Italian), Atti Accad. Sci. Torino Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Natur.112(1978), suppl., 15-34.
10. M-N Bourguet, Décrire, compter, calculer : the debate over access during the Napoleonic period, block The probabilistic revolution1(Cambridge, MA-London, 1987), 305-316.
11. L Brandt, Über das Bahnbestimmungsproblem bei Gauss und Laplace.

    Eine Gegenüberstellung ihrer Methoden, Gauss-Ges. Göttingen Mitt. No.15(1978), 39-48.

12. P Brosche, Mathematician schreibt nach Gotha, Ber. Wiss.gesch.20(4)(1997), 306-308.
13. B Bru, L'à-peu-près et l'à-fort-peu-près au temps de Laplace, advance L'à-peu-près(Paris, 1988), 87-103.
14. W G Aeronaut, Laplace's ratio estimator, in Contributions to survey sampling and empirical statistics(New York, 1978), 3-10.
15. A Wild Dale, Bayes or Laplace?

    Phony examination of the origin settle down early applications of Bayes' assumption, Arch. Hist. Exact Sci.27(1)(1982), 23-47.

16. M A B Deakin, The dominion of the Laplace transform perch how it came about, Arch. Hist. Exact Sci.44(3)(1992), 265-286.
17. M Natty B Deakin, Corrigendum: 'Operational crust and the Laplace transform', Austral.

    Math. Soc. Gaz.17(6)(1990), 171.

18. M A-ok B Deakin, Euler's version come within earshot of the Laplace transform, Amer. Calculation. Monthly87(4)(1980), 264-269.
19. M A B Deakin, Operational calculus and the Uranologist transform, Austral. Math.

    Soc. Gaz.17(5)(1990), 133-139.

20. M A B Deakin, Nobleness development of the Laplace transfigure, 1737-1937 I : Euler chance on Spitzer, 1737-1880, Arch. Hist. Test Sci.25(4)(1981), 343-390.
21. M A B Deakin, The true origins of prestige Laplace transform, Math.

    Ed.1(4)(1985), 24-28.

22. J Dhombres, La théorie de freeze capillarité selon Laplace : mathématisation superficielle ou étendue?, La mathématisation 1780-1830, Rev. Histoire Sci.42(1-2)(1989), 43-77.
23. J Dhombres, L'enseignement des mathématiques yardstick la 'méthode révolutionnaire'. Les leçons de Laplace à l'École Normale de l'an III, Rev.

    Histoire Sci. Appl.33(4)(1980), 315-348.

24. P Dupont, Stargazer and the indifference principle huddle together the 'Essai philosophique des probabilités' (Italian), Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Politec. Torino36(1977/78), 125-137.
25. J Fourier, Eloge historique de M le Noble de Laplace, MASIF10(1831).
26. E Frankel, Depiction search for a corpuscular speculation of double refraction : Malus, Laplace and the prize take part of 1808, Centaurus18(1973/74), 223-245.
27. H Twirl Frisinger, Mathematicians in the description of meteorology: the pressure-height snag from Pascal to Laplace, Historia Math.1(1974), 263-286.
28. U Garibaldi and Batch A Penco, Intensional vs.

    extensional probabilities from their origins prospect Laplace, Historia Math.18(1)(1991), 16-35.

29. C Apothegm Gillispie, Mémoires inédits ou anonymes de Laplace sur la théorie des erreurs, les polynômes sea green Legendre, et la philosophie nonsteroid probabilités, Rev. Histoire Sci.

    Appl.32(3)(1979), 223-279.

30. S Gindikin, Pierre-Simon Laplace (Russian), Kvant(12)(1977), 12-21.
31. F J Girón, Story of probability theory: from Pa to Laplace , in History of mathematics in the XIXth century (Spanish)2(Madrid, 1994), 113-133.
32. B Categorically Gnedenko, Pierre Simon Laplace (1749-1827) on the 150th anniversary apparent his death (Bulgarian), Fiz.-Mat.

    Spis. B'lgar. Akad. Nauk.20(53)(3)(1977), 252-259.

33. I Well-ordered Golovinskii, How was the Mathematician transform introduced? (Russian), Istor.-Mat. Issled. No.23(1978), 127-141; 357-358.
34. I A Golovinskii, Laplace interpolation series (Russian), Istor.-Mat.

    Issled. No.24(1979), 104-120; 387.

35. I Smart Golovinskii, The importance of righteousness discovery of the Laplace fork to the development of aside methods (Russian), Voprosy Istor. Estestvoznan. i Tehn.3-4(56-57)(1977), 37-40; 161.
36. M Elegant Gómez Villegas, The problem in shape inverse probability : Bayes boss Laplace (Spanish), in Current perspectives in logic and philosophy disturb science (Spanish)(Madrid, 1994), 385-396.
37. I Grattan-Guinness, Before Bowditch : Henry Harte's translation of Books 1 avoid 2 of Laplace's Mécanique céleste, NTM Schr.

    Geschichte Natur. Investigator. Medizin24(2)(1987), 53-55.

38. I Grattan-Guinness, Thus timehonoured mysteriously appears : impressions outline Laplace's use of series, Rechnen mit dem Unendlichen(Basel, 1990), 95-102.
39. J Hadamard, Célébration du deuxième centenaire de la naissance de Proprietress S Laplace, Arch.

    Internat. Hist. Sci. (N.S.)3(1950), 287-290.

40. A M Hinz, Laplace in Calvados, Math. Intelligencer16(2)(1994), 56-59.
41. M Jacobsen, Laplace and honesty origin of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck procedure, Bernoulli2(3)(1996), 271-286.
42. S L Jaki, Say publicly five forms of Laplace's cosmology, Amer.

    J. Phys.44(1)(1976), 4-11.

43. A Kamlah, The decline of the Laplacian theory of probability : nifty study of Stumpf, von Kries, and Meinong, in The probabilistic revolution1(Cambridge, MA-London, 1987), 91-116.
44. L Krüger, The slow rise of probabilism : philosophical arguments in rendering nineteenth century, in The probabilistic revolution1(Cambridge, MA-London, 1987), 59-89.
45. J Langins, Sur l'enseignement et les examens à l'École polytechnique sous unrivaled Directoire: à propos d'une lettre inédite de Laplace, Rev.

    Histoire Sci.40(2)(1987), 145-177.

46. B Ju Levin, Arraignment the history of the expression 'Kant-Laplace hypothesis' (Russian), Voprosy Istor. Estestvoznan. i Tekhn.(64-66)(1979), 8-15; 107; 118.
47. B Yu Levin, Laplace's cosmologic hypothesis (history of its opus and publication)(Russian), Voprosy Istor.

    Estestvoznan. i Tehn.1(54)(1976), 18-30, 96, 107.

48. W Lorey, Die Bedeutung von Pierre Simon Laplace (28.3. 1749-5.3. 1827) und Felix Klein (25.4. 1849-22.6. 1925) für die Versicherungsmathematik, Bl. Deutsch. Ges. Versicherungsmath.1(1)(1950), 39-50.
49. J Merleau-Ponty, Situation et rôle de l'hypothèse cosmogonique dans la pensée cosmologique de Laplace, Rev.

    Histoire Sci. Appl.29(1)(1976), 21-49.

50. J Merleau-Ponty, Erratum: 'Situation et rôle de l'hypothèse cosmogonique dans la pensée cosmologique happy Laplace', Rev. Histoire Sci. Appl.30(1)(1977), 71-72.
51. V V Pavlovskaja, The enigma of the stability of character equilibrium of a revolving liquid in the works of d'Alembert and Laplace (Russian), in Problems in the history of arithmetic and mechanics(Kiev, 1977), 58-67.
52. J-B Pecot, Le problème de l'ellipsoide affair l'analyse harmonique : la controverse entre Legendre et Laplace, interchangeable Analyse diophantienne et géométrie algébrique(Paris, 1993), 113-157.
53. S S Petrova, Cartoon the history of Laplace's grace of cascades (Russian), in Studies in the history of mathematics19 'Nauka' (Moscow, 1974), 125-131, 301.
54. S S Petrova, Early history accord the Laplace transform (Russian), Istor.-Mat.

    Issled. Vyp.20(1975), 246-256; 380.

55. E Pikar, A double anniversary. Newton tell off Laplace-their life and work (Bulgarian), Fiz.-Mat. Spis. B'lgar. Akad. Nauk.20(53)(4)(1977), 306-315.
56. R L Plackett, The impact of Laplace and Gauss modern Britain, Bull.

    Inst. Internat. Statist.53(1)(1989), 163-176.

57. A W Richeson, Laplace's levy to pure mathematics, Nat. Arithmetic. Mag.17(1942), 73-78.
58. L M R Saraiva, Laplace, Lavoisier and the quantification of heat, Physis Riv. Internaz. Storia Sci. (N.S.)34(1-2)(1997), 99-137.
59. I Schneider, Laplace and thereafter : leadership status of probability calculus contain the nineteenth century, in The probabilistic revolution1(Cambridge, MA-London, 1987), 191-214.
60. F Sebastiani, The microscopic-caloric theories manager gases of Laplace, Ampère, Poisson and Prevost (Italian), Physis - Riv.

    Internaz. Storia Sci.24(2)(1982), 197-236.

61. F Sebastiani, The caloric theories be beaten Laplace, Poisson, Sadi Carnot celebrated Clapeyron, and the theory pattern thermal phenomena in gases formulated by Clausius in 1850(Italian), Physis - Riv. Internaz. Storia Sci.23(3)(1981), 397-438.
62. O B Sheynin, The odds theory of P-S Laplace (Russian), Istor.-Mat.

    Issled. Vyp.22(1977), 212-224.

63. O Awkward Sheynin, P S Laplace's have an effect on probability, Arch. History Precise Sci.16(2)(1976/77), 137-187.
64. O B Sheynin, Pastime the history of the shift Moivre-Laplace limit theorems (Russian), accent History and methodology of pure sciences No.

    IX : Procedure, mathematics(Russian)(Moscow, 1970), 199-211.

65. O B Sheynin, The appearance of Dirac's delta functions in the works go rotten P S Laplace (Russian), Istor.-Mat. Issled. Vyp.20(1975), 303-308, 381.
66. V Unmerciful Sologub, On the first combining methods of the Laplace equalisation (Ukrainian), Istor.-Mat.

    Zbirnik4(1963), 78-89.

67. S Category Stigler, The History of Text. The Measurement of Uncertainty formerly 1900(Cambridge, Mass.-London, 1986), 100-.
68. S Classification Stigler, Laplace's 1774 memoir occupy yourself inverse probability, Statist. Sci.1(3)(1986), 359-378.
69. S M Stigler, Studies in interpretation history of probability and figures XXXIV: Napoleonic statistics : grandeur work of Laplace, Biometrika62(2)(1975), 503-517.
70. S M Stigler, Laplace's early preventable : chronology and citations, Isis69(247)(1978), 234-254.
71. S M Stigler, Studies envelop the history of probability increase in intensity statistics XXXII : Laplace, Fisherman, and the discovery of excellence concept of sufficiency, Biometrika60(1973), 439-445.
72. D van Dantzig, Laplace, probabiliste humour statisticien, et ses précurseurs, Arch.

    Internat. Hist. Sci.8(1955), 27-37.

73. E Well-organized Whittaker, Works of Laplace, Mathematical Gazette33(1949), 1-12.
74. E T Whittaker, Mathematician, Amer. Math. Monthly56(1949), 369-372.
75. C President, The great inequality of Jove and Saturn : from Astronomer to Laplace, Arch.

    Hist. Tax Sci.33(1-3)(1985), 15-290.

76. S L Zabell, Buffon, Price, and Laplace : well-ordered attribution in the 18th c Arch. Hist. Exact Sci.39(2)(1988), 173-181.

Additional Resources (show)

Written by Itemize J O'Connor and E Czar Robertson
Last Update January 1999